wife can be permitted to sell immovable property of husband if he is in COMA


In view of the above, there appears to be no dispute on facts. The petitioner's husband is in coma. Neither under the Mental Health Act nor under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, there is any provision for appointment of a guardian in such a situation. Though the petitioner could have approached the jurisdictional Civil Court by way of common law remedy, in view of the report of the 3rd respondent and the urgency expressed, coupled with the fact that there is no dispute on facts, this Court is inclined to consider the prayer sought by the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, while accepting the report of the 3rd respondent, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is appointed as guardian of her husband Mr.Mohammed Rafi, residing at NO.12, Nachimuthu Nagar, Koranad, Mayiladuthurai, for the purpose of dealing with his immovable properties and also for the purpose of operating his bank accounts. It is made clear that this order is passed considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and this order will not stand in the way of the legal heirs of the petitioner's husband questioning the transaction of the petitioner on behalf of her ailing husband. 
Madras High Court
Sairabanu Mohammed vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 January, 2016
CORAM MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH W.P. No. 28435 of 2015

Comments