For filing appeal in enhancement of compensation, court fee has to be paid on the basis of the amount difference between amount awarded and amount claimed.
Citation
CDJ 2011 MHC 4392
Gurushankar and others vs special Thasildar Adi dravider welfare
Head note
Constitution of India - Articles 14 & 227, Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act 1978 - Sections 4 to 9, 4(1) to (3), 7(2), 11(1), 14 & 18, Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act 1955 - Section 51, Central Act, Civil Procedure Code 1908 (Central Act V of 1908), Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Rules 1979 - Rule 5, All India Services Act 1951, Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules 1966, Representation of the People Act 1951 - Section 29-A, Court Fees Act 1870 (Central Act) - Section 8 - The dividing line between an administrative power and a quasi-judicial power is quite thin and is being gradually obliterated.
The requirement of acting judicially in essence is nothing but a requirement to act justly and fairly and not arbitrarily or capriciously.
Cases Referred:
Ramaih & ors. v Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Cheranmadevi 2008 (1) CTC 316
Gunasekar & ors. v Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Tirunelveli 2008 (2) CTC 595
The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Krishna Water Supply Project Scheme, Tiruvallur V G. Natesan & 13 ors. 2000 (4) CTC 440
State of Tamil Nadu v Ananthi Ammal (1995) 1 SCC 519
Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v Dy. Land Acquisition Officer AIR 1961 SC 1500
Periyar and Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. v State of Kerala (1991) 4 SCC 195
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd., Meerut v Lakshmi Chand & ors. AIR 1963 SC 677
Province of Bombay v Khushaldas AIR 1950 SC 222
R. v Electricity Commrs. (1924) 1 KB 171 : 1923 ALL ER Rep 150 : 93 LJKB 390 (CA)
A.K. Kraipak v Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 262
Regina v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Ex parte Lain (1967) 2 QB 864 Pg. 881
Rex v Postmaster-General Ex parte Carmichael (1928) 1 KB 291
Rex v Boycott Ex parte Kesslay (1939) 2 KB 651
Reg. v Manchester Legal Aid Committee, Ex parte R.A. Brand & Co. Ltd. (1952) 2 QB 413
Indian National Congress (I) v Institute of Social Welfare & ors. (2002) 5 SCC 685
Comparative Citations:
2011 (4) LW 408, 2011 (5) CTC 129, 2011 AIR(Mad) 224, 2011 (3) MWN(Civil) 753, 2011 (8) MLJ 616,
The requirement of acting judicially in essence is nothing but a requirement to act justly and fairly and not arbitrarily or capriciously.
Cases Referred:
Ramaih & ors. v Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Cheranmadevi 2008 (1) CTC 316
Gunasekar & ors. v Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Tirunelveli 2008 (2) CTC 595
The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Krishna Water Supply Project Scheme, Tiruvallur V G. Natesan & 13 ors. 2000 (4) CTC 440
State of Tamil Nadu v Ananthi Ammal (1995) 1 SCC 519
Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v Dy. Land Acquisition Officer AIR 1961 SC 1500
Periyar and Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. v State of Kerala (1991) 4 SCC 195
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd., Meerut v Lakshmi Chand & ors. AIR 1963 SC 677
Province of Bombay v Khushaldas AIR 1950 SC 222
R. v Electricity Commrs. (1924) 1 KB 171 : 1923 ALL ER Rep 150 : 93 LJKB 390 (CA)
A.K. Kraipak v Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 262
Regina v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Ex parte Lain (1967) 2 QB 864 Pg. 881
Rex v Postmaster-General Ex parte Carmichael (1928) 1 KB 291
Rex v Boycott Ex parte Kesslay (1939) 2 KB 651
Reg. v Manchester Legal Aid Committee, Ex parte R.A. Brand & Co. Ltd. (1952) 2 QB 413
Indian National Congress (I) v Institute of Social Welfare & ors. (2002) 5 SCC 685
Comparative Citations:
2011 (4) LW 408, 2011 (5) CTC 129, 2011 AIR(Mad) 224, 2011 (3) MWN(Civil) 753, 2011 (8) MLJ 616,
Comments
Post a Comment