Revenue Authorities, Police or private litigants - Respondents are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner

Subiksha trading services limited vs The commissioner of police

Head note

Constitution of India - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 10(2)(i) - Section 10(3)(a)(iii) - Section 18 - Petitioner thrown out from premises prior to the time granted by the Rent Controller to vacate the premises - Clearly unauthorised and interfering with the administration of justice - Civil dispute between the parties can be resolved only through the forum created for the civil dispute, here in this case the Rent Control Court - Court are repeatedly giving directions not to interfere in civil disputes between private individuals as adjudication of civil disputes can be made only through courts created for the said purpose and the Court orders are to be obeyed by all concerned, whether it is Revenue Authorities, Police or private litigants - Respondents are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner - Petition allowed

Cases Referred:
1. 2007 (6) Supreme 97 (The Commissioner, Karnataka Housing Board v. C.Muddaiah)
2. AIR 2006 SC 2780 : (2006) 6 SCC 736 (M/s.Indian Oil Corporation v. M/s.NEPC India Ltd)

Comparative Citations:
2010 (4) CTC 324, 2010 (7) MLJ 766