suit for partition - declaration of sale deed null and void - plaintiffs is a literate fellow estopped from raising a plea that sale deed was signed before sub register believing to be mortgage deed - suit filed after 12 years of execution of sale deed beared by limitation.

Citation
2013 (6) CTC 809

N.A.Chinnasamy and others vs vellingirinathan

Comments

  1. Citation
    CDJ 2013 MHC 4356

    Head Note

    Constitution of India - Article 227, Articles 233 to 237, Tamil Nadu Court Fee & Suit Valuation Act - Section 25 (b), Section 25(d), Section 27(c), Civil Procedure Code 1908 - Order 2 Rule 2, Order 7 Rule 11, Order 7 Rules 11(c) & (d), Limitation Act, Indian Evidence Act - Section 114(e) -

    Civil Revision Petition seeking to strike down the plaint pertaining to the suit - filed by the Respondents in Revision Petition - for declaring the sale deed, executed in favour of the petitioners / defendants as null and void.

    Court held - There is no legally acceptable cause of action available to the respondent / plaintiff, for the relief sought for in the plaint - the suit is also barred by statute, namely the Limitation Act - there is no chance of the suit succeeding and accordingly, to meet the ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of court - revision petition allowed and pass orders to struck off the plaint, invoking Article 227 of the Constitution.

    (Paras 1, 2, 3, 53, 54)

    Cases Referred:
    Virgo Industries (Eng) (P) Ltd. v Venturtech Solutions (P) Ltd. (2013) 1 SCC 625
    R. M. Subbiah v S. Ramakrishnan & ors. 2012-1-LW 437
    Southern and Rajamani Transport Private Limited v R. Srinivasan 2010 (4) CTC 690
    Dindigul Pettai Sathangudi Shastriya Nadar Uravinmurai v Selvaraj 2009 (2) CTC 57
    Tamil Nadu Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society v S. R. Ejaz 2009 (5) CTC 710
    Seeni alias Sundarammal v Ramasamy Poosari 2000 (III) CTC 74
    Maria Soosai & anr. v Esakkiammal 1999-1-LW 727
    Ramiah Asari v Kurshad Begaum 1999 (I) CTC 600
    Nesammal v Edward 1998 (II) CTC 537
    Popat and Kotecha Property v State Bank of India Staff Association 2005 (4) CTC 489
    Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. v Ganesh Property (1998) 7 SCC 184
    R. Arumugam v PR. Palanisamy 2013-2-LW 84
    Amaravathy Cranes and Structural Pvt. Ltd. v Rajendra Raja 2013 (2) CTC 756
    Central Govt. Employees' Welfare Housing Organization v Consolidated Civil Constructions (I) Ltd. 2012 (1) MWN (Civ) 633
    K. Ponnamal & ors. v V. Thayanban & ors. 2012-2-LW 193
    Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association v The Board for Control of Cricket in India & anr. 2011-5-LW 838
    Astral Cables Limited v The National Small Industries Corporation Limited & anr. 2011-2-LW 332
    T. Mohanraj v Akila Thiruvidancore Siddha Vaidhya Sangam 2011 (3) MWN (Civil) 787
    V. Krishnamoorthy v Balakrishnan 2011-2-LW 45
    Lili Jabakani J v T. A. Chandrasekhar 2006 (5) CTC 848
    Astral Cables Limited v The National Small Industries Corporation Limited & anr. 2011-2-LW 332
    N. Balakrishnan v M. Krishna Murthy 1998 (7) SCC 123
    K. K. Modi v K. N. Modi (1982 (2) AIR SCW 116)
    K. K. Modi v K. N. Modi (1998) 3 SCC 573
    Vithalbhai (P) Ltd. v Union Bank of India (2005) 4 SCC 315

    Comparative Citations:
    2013 (3) MWN(Civil) 438, 2013 (8) MLJ 92, 2013 (5) LW 350, 2013 (6) CTC 809, 2013 (8) MLJ 92,

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment