Borrowers property sold in auction in spite of communication of stay - borrower ready with cash to settle dues - society directed to return the property
Citation
CDJ 2011 MHC 1260
A.Murugesan vs The sale officer
Head Note
Constitution of India - Article 226, Letters Patent - Clause 15 - Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act 1983 - Section 90, Civil Procedure Code 1908 - Section 151
For the violation of the Court orders - If any leniency or indulgence is shown - there will be an end of Rule of Law. The party against whom a prohibitory order is passed - can only approach the Court to vacate the order or take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
Once a direction is issued by a competent Court - it has to be obeyed - implemented without any reservation. If not complied with or is ignored - there will be an end of Rule of Law. The other party had grievance has remedy - to challenge the order by taking appropriate proceedings - But it cannot be made ineffective - by not complying with the directions. (Para 28)
Cases Referred:
2010 (4) Supreme 519 (Manohar Lal (D) by Lrs v Ugrasen (D) by Lrs.)
Mulraj V Murti Raghunathji Maharaj AIR 1967 SC 1386
Surjit Singh V Harbans Singh, AIR 1996 SC 135
All Bengal Excise Licensees Association V Raghabendra Singh & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 1386
Delhi Development Authority V Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. & Anr. AIR 1996 SC 2005
Gurunath Manohar Pavaskar V Nagesh Siddappa Navalgund AIR 2008 SC 901
2007 (6) Supreme 97 (Commissioner, Karnataka Housing Board v C.Muddaiah)
(2009) 4 MLJ 326 (SC) (Marirudraiah v B.Sarojamma)
(2010) 10 SCC 677 (Ritesh Tewari v State of U.P.)
Champalal Binani v CIT AIR 1970 SC 645 : (1971) 3 SCC 20
Chimajirao Kanhojirao Shirke v Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co.Ltd. (2000) 6 SCC 622 : AIR 2000 SC 2532
LIC v Asha Goel (2001) 2 SCC 160 : AIR 2001 SC 549
Haryana Financial Corporation v Jagdamba Oil Mills (2002) 3 SCC 496
Chandra Singh v State of Rajasthan (2003) 6 SCC 545 : 2003 SCC (L&S) 951
Punjab Roadways v Punja Sahib Bus and Transport Co. (2010) 5 SCC 235
Comparative Citations:
2011 (3) CTC 46, 2011 (3) MLJ 307
For the violation of the Court orders - If any leniency or indulgence is shown - there will be an end of Rule of Law. The party against whom a prohibitory order is passed - can only approach the Court to vacate the order or take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
Once a direction is issued by a competent Court - it has to be obeyed - implemented without any reservation. If not complied with or is ignored - there will be an end of Rule of Law. The other party had grievance has remedy - to challenge the order by taking appropriate proceedings - But it cannot be made ineffective - by not complying with the directions. (Para 28)
Cases Referred:
2010 (4) Supreme 519 (Manohar Lal (D) by Lrs v Ugrasen (D) by Lrs.)
Mulraj V Murti Raghunathji Maharaj AIR 1967 SC 1386
Surjit Singh V Harbans Singh, AIR 1996 SC 135
All Bengal Excise Licensees Association V Raghabendra Singh & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 1386
Delhi Development Authority V Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. & Anr. AIR 1996 SC 2005
Gurunath Manohar Pavaskar V Nagesh Siddappa Navalgund AIR 2008 SC 901
2007 (6) Supreme 97 (Commissioner, Karnataka Housing Board v C.Muddaiah)
(2009) 4 MLJ 326 (SC) (Marirudraiah v B.Sarojamma)
(2010) 10 SCC 677 (Ritesh Tewari v State of U.P.)
Champalal Binani v CIT AIR 1970 SC 645 : (1971) 3 SCC 20
Chimajirao Kanhojirao Shirke v Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co.Ltd. (2000) 6 SCC 622 : AIR 2000 SC 2532
LIC v Asha Goel (2001) 2 SCC 160 : AIR 2001 SC 549
Haryana Financial Corporation v Jagdamba Oil Mills (2002) 3 SCC 496
Chandra Singh v State of Rajasthan (2003) 6 SCC 545 : 2003 SCC (L&S) 951
Punjab Roadways v Punja Sahib Bus and Transport Co. (2010) 5 SCC 235
Comparative Citations:
2011 (3) CTC 46, 2011 (3) MLJ 307
Comments
Post a Comment