Judgment-debtor himself did not raise certain objections which he could have legally raised in the course of execution proceedings before the sale was held - objections were barred by the principles of res judicata

Mohan Lal v. Benoy Krishna, 

AIR 1953 SC 65,

 it was held that the principle of constructive res judicata is applicable to execution proceedings and that the question was no longer debatable. In that case the judgment-debtor himself did not raise certain objections which he could have legally raised in the course of execution proceedings before the sale was held, After the sale, the judgment-debtor in his objections under Order 21, Rule 90 of the Code raised those objections. It was held that the objections were barred by the principles of res judicata