One JD filed application under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC on behalf of all JD, which was pending, when another application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC was moved by the same JD along with some other JDs - application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC was neither ineffective nor barred under law.

Himmatbhai Chaganlal vs. Rikhilal and others reported as 

1978 AIR (SC) 918.

 In that case, one JD filed application under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC, which was pending, when another application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC was moved by the same JD along with some other JDs. It was held that application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC was neither ineffective nor barred under law.