Even after re marriage widow is entitled to compensation for death of her first husband
Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Bridget Irene vs Dincy Devassy on 6 April, 2021
ITEM NO.1 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9844/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-12-2019 in MAC APP No. 26/2019 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) BRIDGET IRENE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DINCY DEVASSY & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 06-04-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sidharth Dave, Sr. Adv Mr. Mushtaq Salim, Adv. Mr. Sayid Marzook Bafaki, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr Adv Mr. Siddhant Sharma, Adv Mr. Karan Bharihoke, AOR Ms. Neha Sahai Bharihoke, Adv UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. Siddhartha Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that in accordance with the judgment of this court titled “Anju Mukhi & Anr. vs. Satish K. Bhatia & Ors. reported in 2010 (15) SCC 630, the first respondent cannot be treated as a dependent of the deceased after re-marriage.
In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we are not inclined to interfere in this matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GEETA AHUJA Date: 2021.04.06 (Geeta Ahuja) (Anand Prakash) 16:31:24 IST Reason: Court Master Court Master
Comments
Post a Comment