The length of delay is not relevant and that rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties
N. Balakrishnan v. H. Krishnamurthy,
1998 (7) SCC 123
where the Supreme Court held that the length of delay is not relevant and that rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties
Citation
N. Balakrishnan Versus M. Krishnamurthy
Head Note
Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 -
Comparative Citations:
1998 AIR(SC) 3222, 1998 (4) CLT 63, 1998 (6) JT 242, 1998 (7) Supreme 209, 1998 (5) Scale 105, 1998 (7) SCC 123, 1998 (7) SLT 334, 1999 (1) SRJ 233, 1998 AIR(SCW) 3139, 1999 (1) LW 739, 1999 (1) MLJ 114,
Comparative Citations:
1998 AIR(SC) 3222, 1998 (4) CLT 63, 1998 (6) JT 242, 1998 (7) Supreme 209, 1998 (5) Scale 105, 1998 (7) SCC 123, 1998 (7) SLT 334, 1999 (1) SRJ 233, 1998 AIR(SCW) 3139, 1999 (1) LW 739, 1999 (1) MLJ 114,
Comments
Post a Comment