where physical possession of such land continues to be with the owner, the statutory vesting under Section 11 (3) of the Act is of no relevance at all

Citation 2002(2) L.S.764, (C.V.Narasimhan Vs., The Government of Tamilnadu etc., and 2 others), while considering the impact of the Repealing Act, had held that “where physical possession of such land continues to be with the owner, the statutory vesting under Section 11 (3) of the Act is of no relevance at all”

Comments