Suit for partition suit filed by two daughters 31 years after the demise of their father - plaintiffs ousted and with knowledge the defendants their were in enjoyment of the property - Already Partition took place in 1991 between father and son - Partition suit by daughter dismissed.

2022-1-L.W. 902

2022(4) CTC 590


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 

Reserved on: 09.02.2022 

Pronounced on : 22.02.2022 

Appeal Suit No.251 of 2011

 Dr.G.Jayachandran, J.

Puniyavathi, W/o.T.Kaliaperumal & = another /versus/   Pachaiammal & others Respondents/Defendants

Prayer:- This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and decree dated 06.12.2010 and made in O.S.No.106 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Judge cum-Fast Track Court No.2, Cuddalore.Partition/ouster, pleaOuster/partition, daughter's share Succession Act (1956), Section 6

Suit for partition suit filed by two daughters 31 years after the demise of their father, when open succession para 21

plaintiffs ousted and with knowledge the defendants their were in enjoyment of the property exclusively adverse to the plaintiffs for more than the period prescribed para 24

plaintiffs as co-sharer had not produced any evidence to show that they had animus to possess the property para 25 


Comments