Partition having been effected between Co-Owners in 1979 itself, 1990 or 2005 Act not applicable-Held, daughter not entitled to claim any right/share in Suit property.

Citation

2021 (5) CTC 766 (Mad)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS (Madurai Bench)

N. Sathish Kumar, J.

 

AS. (MD) No.174 of 2011 & M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2011.

March 31, 2021

 

V.S. Guruswamy Nadar (Died) and 13 Others                             ...Appellant

                                        ...VS...

S. Ananthammal and 23 Others                                              ...Respondent

Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (30 of 1956), Section 6 Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989 (1 of 1990), Section 29 A-Daughter's entitlement as Coparcener crystallized only after enactment of Act 1 of 1990 of Tamil Nadu Act or Act 39 of 2005- Partition having been effected between Co-Owners in 1979 itself, 1990 or 2005 Act not applicable-Held, daughter not entitled to claim any right/share in Suit property.

It is also pleaded in the Plaint axif Shanmuna Nader has inherited the propaty If the entire pleading is trad harmoniously it will eve

Suit reoperties ar Ancestral