Suit for recovery of money - defendants purchasing product and also making payments in Head Office at place 'B' - Part of cause of action definitely arising at place 'B' - Court at place'B' would have territorial jurisdiction to entertain suit.

Citation
AIR 2018 HYDERABAD 28

HYDERABAD HIGH COURT

D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU , J.

CCCA No. 169 of 1999, D/- 9 - 11 - 2017

M/s. Plywood Syndicate and Ors. v. M/s. National Plywood Industries Limited, Hyderabad

(A)Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), S.20, O.37 R.1 - Territorial jurisdiction - Suit for recovery of money -
Plea of defendants that entire transaction taking place at place 'A' and so Court at place 'B' did
not have jurisdiction to entertain suit - Evidence on record showing that defendants purchasing
product and also making payments in Head Office at place 'B' - Defendant in cross-examination
admitting that payments used to be made at Head Office and also correspondence was with
Head Office at place 'B' - Part of cause of action definitely arising at place 'B' - Court at place
'B' would have territorial jurisdiction to entertain suit. (2010) 6 Andh LD 484, Disting.
 (Paras 7 , 8)

Comments