Defendant, neighbour of plaintiff alleged to have encroached pathway - Plaintiffs personally affected - Therefore plaintiffs have locus standi to file suit - Order directing defendant to remove said encroachment - Proper.
Citation
AIR 2004 MADRAS 492
MADRAS HIGH COURT
(Principal Seat at MADRAS)
V. KANAGARAJ , J.
S.A. No. 549 of 1993, D/- 15 - 6 - 2004
Perumal Naicker Appellants v. Rathina Naicker and another Respondents
Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), S.91 - Removal of obstruction of public pathway - Defendant, neighbour
of plaintiff alleged to have encroached pathway - Plaintiffs personally affected by nuisance
created by defendant - Said wrongful act also affecting general public - Therefore plaintiffs have
locus standi to file suit - Concurrent finding of trial and appellate Court that defendant have
encroached said pathway - Order directing defendant to remove said encroachment - Proper.
(Paras 11 , 12)
Comments
Post a Comment