Pronote inadmissible in evidence as not duly stamped - Oral evidence cannot be adduced to prove terms of pronote -

Citation

AIR 1985 ANDHRA PRADESH 26

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

RAMASWAMY , J.

Second Appeal No. 1080 of 1980, D/- 13 - 4 - 1984

Bollam Venkataiah Appellants v. Venumuddala Venkata Ramana Reddy Respondent

Negotiable Instruments Act (26 of 1881), S.4 - Stamp Act (2 of 1899), S.35 - Suit on pronote -

Borrowing and execution of pronote forming part of same transaction - Pronote inadmissible

in evidence as not duly stamped - Oral evidence cannot be adduced to prove terms of pronote -

Suit cannot be laid on original cause of action. Pronote - Stamp. Evidence Act (1 of 1872), S.91 -