A mere mis- description of property in decree would not make the decree inexecutable Objec- tion, dismissed

Citation

AIR 2023 MADRAS 134 : AIROnline 2023 MAD 132 RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

N. Annamalai v. P. Thangamani (Died) and others. Manu

C.M.S.ANO. 66 of 2021, D/- 9-3-2023.

Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), O. 21 Rr. 32, 97, 101, Ss. 35, 47, 152- Execution of decree Objection as to - Decree holder gave De boundaries in schedule which was not clearly spelt out in plaint schedule scription of boundary does not affect the decree as decree holder was held as owner of 4/5th share of suit property It was only case of mis-description- A mere mis- description of property in decree would not make the decree inexecutable Objec- tion, dismissed and costs of Rs. 5,000/- imposed to be payable to decree holder.

AIR 2003 SC 643, AIR 1963 SC 1879, Followed. (Paras 8, 9, 10, 11)

Cases Referred: Chronological Paras

AIROnline 2021 Mad 1403