Failure of defendant to prove non-existence of consideration - Onus cannot be shifted on plaintiff - Claim made by plaintiff has to be allowed even if evidence adduced by plaintiff is found to be unbelievable in rebuttal of defendant's case.

Citation
AIR 1999 SUPREME COURT 1008
 
SUPREME COURT
 
(From : 1996 (2) Cal HN 327)
 
V. N. KHARE , J. and R. P. SETHI , J.
 
Civil Appeal No. 4576 of 1997, D/- 18 - 2 - 1999
 
Bharat Barrel and Drum Manufacturing Company Appellant v. Amin Chand Payrelal Respondent.
 
Negotiable Instruments Act (26 of 1881), S.118 - Promissory note - Presumption as to
consideration - Burden of proof - Promissory note alleged to have been executed as a collateral
security and not for "value received" as mentioned therein - Failure of defendant to prove non-
existence of consideration - Onus cannot be shifted on plaintiff - Claim made by plaintiff has
to be allowed even if evidence adduced by plaintiff is found to be unbelievable in rebuttal of
defendant's case.
(1996) 2 Cal HN 327, Reversed.

Comments