when the principal debtor did not repay the bank loan, the bank as creditor can adjust it at maturity of the Fixed Deposit Receipts deposited by the guarantor with the bank as security, though the debt became barred by limitation at the time of maturity of the said Fixed Deposit Receipts
Citation
AIR 1992 SUPREME COURT 1815
SUPREME COURT
(From : Madhya Pradesh)*
K. RAMASWAMY , J. and B. P. JEEVAN REDDY , J.
Criminal Appeal No.254 of 1992, D/- 20 - 4 - 1992
Punjab National Bank and others Appellants v. Surendra Prasad Sinha Respondent.
(A)Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.409 - Breach of trust - Bank loan - Recovery of - Debt barred by limitation - Adjustment of FDR securities deposited by guarantor thereafter by bank on maturity of said deposits - Not a criminal breach of trust. Banking - Loan recovery - Debt barred by limitation - Adjustment of securities deposited by guarantor towards debt thereafter - Permissible.
Contract Act (9 of 1872), S.128 - Limitation Act (36 of 1963), S.3 - S.3 of the Limitation Act only bars the remedy but does not destroy the right which the remedy relates to. The right to the debt continues to exist notwithstanding the remedy is barred by the limitation. Therefore when the principal debtor did not repay the bank loan, the bank as creditor can adjust it at maturity of the Fixed Deposit Receipts deposited by the guarantor with the bank as security, though the debt became barred by limitation at the time of maturity of the said Fixed Deposit Receipts. It
is not obligatory to file a suit to recover the debt. Such adjustment would not amount to offences punishable under Ss.109, 114 and 409 of the Penal Code. (Para 4)
(B)Criminal P.C. (2 of 1974), S.204, S.482 - Issue of process - Complaint case - Relevant facts and circumstances should be considered before issuing process - Process issued mechanically on basis of complaint filed as vendetta to harass persons - Compliant quashed.
Comments
Post a Comment