court directed 8th respondent to furnish security - an order passed in the application filed under Order 38 rule 5 would not come under purview of appealable orders appeal not maintainable.

Citation 

2024-1-L.W. 154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved on: 02.11.2023

Delivered on : 20.11.2023

O.S.A(CAD)No.70 of 2021 CMP.No.13903 of 2021

 D.Krishnakumar, J., and P.Dhanabal, J.

A.Pradeep ... Appellant

Vs.

Tmt.Binu Christeena & others ... Respondents

C.P.C., Order 38 rule 5, Order 43 rule 1 Commercial courts act (2015), Section 13(1)

object and scope of Order 38 rule 5 court directed 8th respondent to furnish security - Appeal against that order -

held an order passed in the application filed under Order 38 rule 5 would not come under purview of appealable orders appeal not maintainable.