Misquoting provision of law Misquoting of provision, not fatal to case of Petitioner

Citation 

2016 (3) MWN (Civil) 264 (Mad)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

M. Duraiswamy, 1.

C.R.P.(NPD) Nos. 4291 & 4292 of 2015 and M.P. No.1 of 2015.

September 29, 2016

Fraulin.                                ...Appellant

Vs

S. Thilagavathy.              ..Respondent

TAMTI NADU BUILDINGS (LEASE AND RENT CONTROL) ACT, 1960 (T.N. Act 18 of 1960), Sections 10(3)(a)(ii) & 10(3)(a)(i) Misquoting of provision Consequence of Petition for Eviction from Residential and Non-Residential building Petition filed only under Section 10(3) (3) (ⅲ) Section 10(3)(6)(0) pertaining to Residential building, not mentioned in Petition Held, litigant cannot be expected to know minute details of law and cannot be penalised for misquoting provision of law Misquoting of provision, not fatal to case of Petitioner Decision in Batco Roadways, 2009 (2) CTC 705 referred to Order of Lower Appellate Court granting Eviction for both Residential and Non Residential building, upheld Civil Revision Petition dismissed. [Para 19 to 21]